AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

US Treasuries

July 21, 2008

News from all over, again . . . indymac, bear stearns, fannie, freddie, and the beat goes on and on and on

New Yorker editor David Remnick said the provocative cartoon was intended to satirize those [Obama's religion and other] rumors and those who traffic in them. In fact, the New Yorker is a publication that would be inclined to support Obama.

New York Gov. David Peterson, the state's first black governor, condemned the cover as "one of the most malignant, vicious" magazine covers he's ever seen.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People called it "tasteless, Islam-a-phobic, mean-spirited and racially offensive."

The Obama campaign early on called the cartoon "tasteless" and "offensive" and even Republican presidential candidate John McCain referred to the cover as "inappropriate."

Judge for yourself - I don't care for it at all.


Barackcoverthumb
Lehmanlogo_3

Back in the news, Indicted former Bear Stearns hedge-fund manager Ralph Cioffi has hocked houses in New Jersey and Naples, Fla. to secure a $4 million bond, but saved the Southampton digs for the family. Bearstearns


According to Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick Sinclair the government is considering further criminal charges against two former Bear Stearns executives indicted last month related to the collapse of two hedge funds they oversaw.  In a court hearing in U.S. District Court in Brooklyn, Sinclair said "the government is indeed contemplating additional charges." Reuters for full story


Cioffitannin_2

And, check this out!! According to the New York Post, Cioffi would like to start an independent hedge fund and may have some investors lined up . . . wonder if they'll still be there in 20 years . . . .


Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac . . . End of Illusions.  The Econonmist has a series of articles detailing the problems at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Now that we've jumped to trillions of dollars at their behest, surely the American Public will sit up and pay attention to what the federal reserve is doing to us by printing more and more money. Highly detailed, easy to understand . . . you should read every word.

Hank Paulson, America’s treasury secretary, unveiled the emergency plan to save Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two mortgage giants that owe or guarantee $5.2 trillion.  He wants you to know how imortant it is so you won't mind paying for it . . . this isn't capitalization or free markets as we know them, this is nationalization and it will only create problems for the people who pay the bills.  That would be me and you . . .


The FBI had launched an investigation of IndyMac Bank for possible mortgage fraud shortly before the thrift was closed by regulators and placed into receivership, according to news reports. Fraud and they failed . . . they couldn't do anything right then could they?

Even though mortgage fraud for housing "doesn't seem quite as violent" as mortgage fraud for profit, it has its own consequences, according to a representative of the Florida Office of Financial Regulation's Bureau of Financial Investigations. Fraud for Housing is when a borrower commits fraud to get housing, as opposed to fraud for monetary gain.

And that, my dears is life in my lane . . . I'm seriously thinking of Montana . . . horse, bedroll, rifle.  Sounds like the place to be to me!
Cowgirl

July 20, 2008

INNOVATIVE FINANCING

In the days where one only hears about the credit crisis and lack of liquidity, people are stymied on where to turn to finance their latest projects. While the reality is there has been a huge change in residential financing (probably for the better, and probably forever!) commercial lending programs have not been affected as much, although lately commercial lenders are finding it harder to sell their paper because of lack of liquidity in the market in general.

As it is harder to get the money to get projects off the ground, we’ve tried to stay ahead of the curve and maintain as many options for our borrowers as possible. While there are still straightforward choices like SBA loans and commercial loans for expansion, purchases and refinances, and Church loans based on tithing, we’ve found there are other forms of financing that aren’t as complicated or time consuming and for the most part also aren’t as costly as traditional financing.

I’ve added stockloans from Hedgelender to my portfolio of products and capital advances against credit cards.

The beauty of both programs is they are not based on applications, financial statements, tax returns or credit criteria. And they both fund VERY quickly.

Stock Loans can be used for any number of things, and can be made through a myriad of choices. Here are some highlights:

  • Finance your real estate with interest-only repayment while still retaining participation in your stock portfolio;

  • Refinance your MARGIN LOAN to remove the possibility of a call;

  • Expand Your Business with interest-only repayment while still retaining participation in your stock portfolio;

  • Diversity Your Investments while retaining beneficial ownership of your portfolio;

  • Roll your Employee Stock Options into cash while continuing to participate in your stock.

Ironically, these loans run to the millions and sometimes tens of millions, and take 1/10th the time to process and fund. And, they are strictly based on the worth of the stock and the amount of shares traded; the ONLY collateral is the stock and . . . credit is NOT a criteria. Neither is purpose, as long as it is legal!

Capital Advances against credit cards is NOT a loan program - but is a purchase of future sales.

Like the stock loan, there is NO long application, financial statement requirement OR tax return requirement; Funds immediately based on credit card sales; factors ALL credit cards receivables - Visa, Mastercard, American Express and Discover.

Clients are using the money for expansion and renovation; Marketing and Advertising; purchase of new locations; Increases to inventory; purchasing much needed equipment Repairs and upgrades; buying out an existing partner; recapture of investment capital; even to pay bills and taxes.

Finer explanations and details are listed on my website PallasFinancier.Com.

July 12, 2008

Brad Inman on the collapse of the secondary housing market

Brad Inman is founder and publisher of Inman News.

In the afternath of the news about fannie mae, freddie mac and the NEW IndyMac FEDERAL BANK, Brad Inman made ten predictions about the collapse of the secondary housing market.

"...Those that do lend will revert to back-to-basics underwriting: perfect credit, large down payments, proof of income, personal character and good family upbringing.

"...Housing industry lobbyists will make the mortgage liquidity problem their number one policy issue in the next two years. They will argue that the sky is falling and it is.

"...Like so many parts of our American culture, the accessibility to unlimited and poorly scrutinized debt helped turn Americans into a sloppy group of consumers, which spawned greedy Wall Streeters, out of control lenders and starry-eyed investors."

Read all ten, and the rest of his article at Imagine housing without a secondary market

November 15, 2007

HR 3915 On to a new vote

FHA Secure

The FHA Secure program is available to borrowers who have late mortgage payments due to their arm adjusting upwards and making their house payments too high to handle.  FHA will refinance, with no penalty for the lates, and allow you to keep a second mortgage, even if the value of your house has fallen and the loan to value is now over 100%.

If the loan limits are changed to $417,000, thousands of people will qualify to refinance with an FHA loan - their interest rate will go down (way down) and they can get a fixed rate loan for 30 years.  What a boon!

And the amazing thing is that the FHA is making it easier for Brokers to do FHA loans, while HR 3915 appears to be trying to wipe out mortgage brokers across the country and redesign the lending system so that only about 20% of the American population will qualify for a conventional loan.

H.R. 3915 highlights

  • the removal of yield spread premium to brokers in most instances.  Yield spread is paid to brokers as an indirect income from lenders they sell loans to.  Apparently Capital Hill thinks every broker in the country is making a mint off yield spread and "steering" borrowers to loans that aren't good for them for the profit from yield spread payments.

There is something else to do with that money -Spend it on the borrower to help them get a loan.

I got a call Friday from a lady who was going to buy a house that needed work and she wanted the purchase money and the rehab money in one loan.  Countrywide had offered her the same loan at 6.875 and she wasn't getting enough love from her Countrywide loan officer.  She asked if I could do the loan, and I said sure, and so we did her application, priced her loan and sent her the docs.

This loan has a pricing adjustment (a charge of 1%) to rate because of the rehabilitation money.  (Anything that varies from an 80%, full doc, 30 year loan for someone with perfect credit has some sort of adjustment to rate - that's why what you see in the newspapers and on the internet is NOT what you're offered when you ask for rate, unless of course, you're that borrower)  Because of that fee, her closing costs were going up $1,150 (1%) and she hardly had 3% to put down.

With my yield spread premium, I was able to pay her 1% for her, and get her a rate of 6.5% and had a fannie mae approval within an hour or two of talking to her.  I emailed the list of documents I needed, and she has a loan.

I did a better job for her than Countrywide (much bigger player than me) and empowered her to buy her house, and with a better loan.  HR 3915 wouldn't have allowed it, even though it was to her benefit.

Thousands of Brokers do the same thing - there is no other way to get a no closing cost loan, but to put the cost into rate, and pay the costs from the yield.

  • Additionally, HR 3915 will not allow the financing of closing costs and prepaids.  On refinance transactions, this is normally a given - you roll your costs in, lower the interest rate, lower the payment, and nothing out of your pocket.  If this bill becomes law, every refinance will mean you write a check for 3-4% of the loan amount - and that's going to hurt most people.
  • There are many other line items that will create such a burden for lenders that I think most lenders won't do the loans under those circumstances, or will increase the cost of the loan (the interest rate you pay) to cover their liability.  I've heard estimates that these changes will raise interest rates by as much as 2%.  And that is if you can prove your income, your ability to repay the loan, have exemplary credit and a lot of money to put down on a house.  Otherwise, you'll stay where you are.  And if that means in your parents' house, you'll probably still be there to inherit it.

The worst irony is that they, Capital Hill, have decided to see that there are NEVER again months and months of foreclosures for loans that should not have been made.  In a free market place, the fact that lenders have lost BILLIONS of dollars on these loans, and decided they didn't want to do any more because they don't want it to happen again either, would resolve the entire issue.

And, in this market that we have now, lenders have done just that.  100% investor purchases started disappearing last December.  The lenders saw the writing on the wall - they wanted to stop the madness.  As the year has gone on, more and more programs have gone away (along with about 200 lenders who went out of business), so we are down to mostly plain vanilla at the lenders ice cream shop.

The market is repairing itself.  It isn't over - there are more loans in default, and more will go into foreclosure, but this "perfect storm" will never pass this way again.  The market can't bear it.

Capital Hill, with its vote-getting mentality in full evidence, either doesn't want to hear the truth about the market being in correction, or can't understand the complexity of the mortgage market as it really works. 

The country has a whole doesn't have huge foreclosure problems.  There are pockets that do have huge problems: California, Arizona, Nevada, Florida.  Those areas will take longer to come back, because that is where the largest numbers of foreclosures exist.

But the reality is that 70% of the country is experiencing growth in real estate markets.  It isn't what it was twelve months ago, but it isn't declining.

It will be declining, however, if this law actually passes as it stands today.  When only 20% of the population can qualify for and get a mortgage, there won't be many houses sold, I can't see that there will be any new ones built, and the fallout from real estate not moving will be a tremendous blow to this entire country. 

Funny, I said in my blog months ago I had stopped worrying about the mortgage meltdown, and even my meltdown, and had moved my concern up a notch or two, to cover the entire USA.  One of my readers told me that wasn't my job.  Whether it is my job or not, it is my country and my children are growing up here . . . And I'm thinking that instead of them moving on after college, and me selling my big house and getting two small ones (one on the beach for the winter, and one in Montana for the rest of the year) we're all still going to be together in 2025.  Horrors!

Thursday, November 15
H.R. 3915 will be brought up on the floor of the United States House of Representatives.
 

If you don't know about HR 3915, you should read the final text (as it stands today).  I suggest you read it and then get in touch with your representatives and let them know that you are concerned (you should be) about where they are pushing this country with HR 3915.

You can find your elected officials here

I've asked my friends, my clients and my family to do the same thing.  If everyone doesn't make enough noise about this bill, life in these United States is going to be a different place in a couple of years.

Pax et bonum

ps.  From my friends at Vertice, the current MARKET COMMENTARY for 11/13/2007:

U.S. 10-year Treasuries fell for the first time in a week as investors pulled out of longer-dated debt on speculation inflation will accelerate. The decline pushed yields up from the lowest in two years before reports this week that economists predict will show growth in wholesale and consumer prices quickened in October. Equity futures pointed toward stronger U.S. stock markets later today, crimping the appeal of safer government debt. Trading was closed yesterday because of a holiday in the U.S. Ostwald predicted the 10-year note will yield between 4.2 percent and 4.35 percent this week. Analysts' forecasts compiled by Bloomberg, with the most recent predictions given the heaviest weightings, suggest it will rise to 4.48 percent by the end of the first quarter of 2008.

November 07, 2007

COMMITTEE PASSES H.R. 3915 45 - 19

GOES TO FULL HOUSE NEXT WEEK

So, Senator Bradley Miller's bill has the approval of 45 of his peers.  It moves on to the House, and then President Bush has the choice to sign it or veto it.  My Republican friends don't think he will ever let government take over the market in such a gross fashion, but my Democrat friends think he may throw this bone to the Dems because he has taken such a hard line on other things.

Read the final mark up of the bill as it passed.

Whatever happens, the face of the mortgage industry is changing, and on the surface it appears that "Big Brother" is taking care of consumers who can't take care of themselves . . . Yeah, you can read into that remark that I don't think "BB" needs to interfere with our lives anymore, AND that consumers should be responsible for the things they do.  Particularly when they make a commitment for 30 years and a lot of money.

I know there are loan officers who made loans with no thought to the consequences for the borrower and made a lot of money doing it.  I'm not one of them, and I don't think all of them worked for broker shops. 

I also know that what the politicians are ignoring is that America has a "hunger" for credit, and expects to get everything on a signature, not with the exchange of cold hard cash.  Theoretically, they know they'll pay for using other people's money, but most don't look at it as realistically as, say, Dave Ramsey or Suze Orman.

They are also ignoring the fact that Wall Street fed that hunger with loan programs that created a lot of profit, because selling money makes money.

Two Wall Street firms moved directly into the sub prime market with their own mortgage companies to feed the greed:

Merrill-Lynch bought First Franklin (a company specializing in sub-prime loans) for $1.3 billion on Dec. 30, 2006.  Why?  Because the money was great!

Bear Stearns opened Bear Stearns Residential in 2005.  This from Business Wire "Bear Stearns Residential will focus on non-conforming loans which are included in the private label MBS market."  Read non-conforming: sub prime loans.

"The addition of a wholesale unit complements our presence as the largest underwriter of mortgage-backed securities," said Warren Spector, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer of Bear Stearns. "The business allows us to round out our mortgage franchise and provides us with an additional way to serve our clients. By employing the latest technology, we are enabling brokers to come directly to Wall Street for financing."

Loan Officers are sales people.  Face it.  They sell a product.  Money.  They do a lot of other things, the good ones consider long term goals of the borrowers, and real life circumstances, along with usually un-meet able expectations of the uninitiated.  And they give advice, answer endless questions about credit, pricing, payments, programs.  But it isn't a charity.  They do it, like I do, for pay.  We have families to support, we can't do it for nothing!

Then there are loan officers who for whatever reason, be it greed, ignorance or lack of support from their company,  will put a loan where ever it will close fastest and pay the most.  And sometimes, they place loans that way because the borrower wants it that way - "I don't care what it costs, it has to close in 7 days!"  They don't care before it closes, but they will after it closes . . .

So, my take on this is-

  • The way America works will change with this bill.  Mortgages won't be easy to get (that has already happened, and will worsen)
  • Where America gets mortgages will change - Brokers will disappear, maybe not all of them, but a lot of them will do something else.  They might work for a Bank or a lender, or they might change industries.  (Something I've thought seriously about for a couple of years.  This is hard work, not easy money, and there is a tremendous amount of stress involved.  If the stress increases and the money decreases, there comes a time when it just doesn't work anymore.)
  • We all know that when there isn't money to buy houses, there isn't money to build houses, and that means there isn't money to pay people in the real estate industry, or the construction industry, and that will trickle down to manufacturers.  That is a lot of people who aren't making money like they were.
  • When there isn't any homequity money to use for debt consolidation, there are no credit cards being paid off, because we all know most people in this country aren't making huge payments on credit card debt out of their paychecks. 

While I do believe that most things politicians do is primarily motivated by votes, and they leap to causes that will generate attention that they are concerned with their constituents' well being, these guys are offering some positive changes.  Training and licensing requirements for loan officers is a very good thing.  I've worked for a lot of companies in my 20 years in this business, and mostly, it is self-taught.  Loan Officers learn a lot from the lenders they sell too, also. So, if the only reps calling on your company were from New Century Mortgage, or First Franklin, you got a lot of influence from the sub-prime mindset.  Remember, they were selling too.

Attempting to change the way the market works by outlawing yield spread, and regulating underwriting guidelines is probably not such a great idea.  I'm sure none of these lawmakers learned all the nuances of underwriting and risk management in the months since the sub-prime meltdown, but they want to redo the way the country runs.  Impressive, isn't it?

The market would, if left alone, correct itself.  Stated income loan guidelines are being changed every day.  Stricter reasonableness tests of income have become standard with every lender I work with.  The orchids of the mortgage world, the exotica, like Elvis, have mostly left the building.  If they aren't gone, they are stripped down, and unappealing, so that borrowers don't qualify, or don't want them.

Everyone needs to remember that lenders don't want houses, they want the money.  Since they are stuck with the foreclosures, they are doing everything they can to ensure that they don't write any more loans that fail. 

I'm lately reading Mobs, Messiahs, and Markets, a really GREAT book by William Bonner and Lila Rajiva.  It is hysterically funny, packed with good information, and well written; not like other dry, overly intellectual books on finance and politics. 

There is a line in the Chapter "The Devil Made Them Do It" that reminds me of all the people behind H.R.3915:

"It was not what people did not know that proved their undoing: it was what they thought they knew that wasn't so."

Peace.

November 05, 2007

MARKET COMMENTARY

From my friends at Vertice:

U.S. Treasuries rose, driving yields on two-year notes to near their lowest since July 2005, after Citigroup Inc. said it may reduce the value of subprime mortgages and related securities by as much as $11 billion.

Investors bought government debt as a haven from a decline in stock markets and high-risk assets. Treasuries are headed for their best year since 2002, topping returns produced by European bonds, on speculation the financial-market turmoil will hurt the world's largest economy more than anywhere else, a Merrill Lynch & Co. index shows. Citigroup Chief Executive Officer Charles Prince resigned after the company said yesterday that subprime mortgages and related securities may have lost as much as $11 billion of their value in the past month, a decline that may wipe out half of the company's profit so far this year

  • StockLoan
  • Apply Online

July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

  • yahoo stock quotes
  • wsj
  • yahoo buzz